Heterosexual: dummy variable in which intimate minority = 0 and you can heterosexual = step one

Heterosexual: dummy variable in which intimate minority = 0 and you can heterosexual = step one

M = mean. SD = standard deviation. Sk = skewness. SE = standard error; # = number. Usage time, measured in months. Use frequency, measured as times/week. Men: dummy variable where women = 0 and men = 1. Age, measured in years. Bold values correspond to statistically significant coefficients (p < 0.05).

Towards the half dozen sensed attributes, five regression activities shown tall performance with ps ? 0.036 (just about exactly how many personal dating, p = 0.253), however, every R good d j dos was indeed brief (assortment [0.01, 0.10]). Considering the large number of projected coefficients, i limited our awareness of the individuals statistically tall. Guys had a tendency to have fun with Tinder for a longer time (b = dos.fourteen, p = 0.032) and you can gained more family relations thru Tinder (b = 0.70, p = 0.008). Intimate minority professionals satisfied a larger number of people offline (b = ?step one.33, p = 0.029), had so much more sexual matchmaking (b = ?0.98, p = 0.026), and you can achieved a whole lot more friends through Tinder (b = ?0.81, p = 0.001). More mature professionals put Tinder for longer (b = 0.51, p = 0.025), with an increase of frequency (b = 0.72, p = 0.011), and you may satisfied more folks (b = 0.31, p = 0.040).

Because of the desire of the manuscript, i simply discussed the differences based on Tinder have fun with

Results of the latest regression activities getting Tinder motives and their descriptives are offered in Desk 4 . The results was purchased inside descending buy because of the score mode. The newest aim that have highest means was curiosity (Yards = cuatro.83; impulse level step 1–7), interest (Yards = 4.44), and you will intimate positioning (Yards = cuatro.15). Individuals with straight down means was basically peer stress (Yards = 2.20), ex boyfriend (Yards = 2.17), and you may belongingness (M = step one.66).

Dining table 4

M = mean. SD = afrointroductions standard deviation. Sk = skewness. SE = standard error. Men: dummy variable where women = 0 and men = 1. Age, measured in years. Dependent variables were standardized. Motives were ordered by their means. Bold values correspond to statistically significant coefficients (p < 0.05).

For the 13 considered motives, seven regression models showed significant results (ps ? 0.038), and six were statistically nonsignificant (ps ? 0.077). The R a d j 2 tended to be small (range [0.00, 0.13]). Again, we only commented on those statistically significant coefficients (when the overall model was also significant). Women reported higher scores for curiosity (b = ?0.53, p = 0.001), pastime/entertainment (b = ?0.46, p = 0.006), distraction (b = ?0.38, p = 0.023), and peer pressure (b = ?0.47, p = 0.004). For no motive men’s means were higher than women’s. While sexual minority participants showed higher scores for sexual orientation (as could be expected; b = –0.75, p < 0.001) and traveling (b = ?0.37, p = 0.018), heterosexual participants had higher scores for peer pressure (b = 0.36, p = 0.017). Older participants tended to be more motivated by relationship-seeking (b = 0.11, p = 0.005), traveling (b = 0.08, p = 0.035), and social approval (b = 0.08, p = 0.040).

The results for the 10 psychological and psychosexual variables are shown in Table 5 . All the regression models were statistically significant (all ps < 0.001). Again, the R a d j 2 tended to be small, with R a d j 2 in the range [0.01, 0.15]. The other coefficients were less informative, as they corresponded to the effects adjusted for Tinder use. Importantly, Tinder users and nonusers did not present statistically significant differences in negative affect (b = 0.12, p = 0.146), positive affect (b = 0.13, p = 0.113), body satisfaction (b = ?0.08, p = 0.346), or self-esteem as a sexual partner (b = 0.09, p = 0.300), which are the four variables related to the more general evaluation of the self. Tinder users showed higher dissatisfaction with sexual life (b = 0.28, p < 0.001), a higher preoccupation with sex (b = 0.37, p < 0.001), more sociosexual behavior (b = 0.65, p < 0.001), a more positive attitude towards casual sex (b = 0.37, p < 0.001), a higher sociosexual desire (b = 0.52, p < 0.001), and a more positive attitude towards consensual nonmonogamy (b = 0.22, p = 0.005).

Опубликовано в

Categories